Summary
Rev. Wan begins by grieving that people meant to support the
listener have added to her suffering with an incomplete
picture of Scripture. The passages most often cited on divorce
(Matthew 19:3–9; Mark 10:2–12; 1 Corinthians 7) affirm God's
ideal of permanence in marriage, but even they allow
exceptions: sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9) and abandonment
by an unbelieving spouse (1 Corinthians 7:15).
A growing number of theologians and pastors, including many
with a high view of marriage, now recognise ongoing physical
abuse as abandonment of the marriage covenant: a husband who
violently harms his wife has abandoned his vow to love her as
Christ loved the church (Ephesians 5:25). Using Scripture to
trap a woman in danger inverts the very heart of those
passages. God's heart for the oppressed runs throughout the
Bible (Psalm 34:18; Psalm 10:17–18), and Jesus repeatedly put
the vulnerable ahead of religious rule-keeping. Separating for
safety is not a failure of faith.
He tells of a church member's wife who hid her injuries from
her husband's drunken violence; when counselling didn't stop
it, he advised her to separate. She later divorced, received
custody of their two children, is now happily remarried, and
is thankful she wasn't counselled to stay.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
I'm in an abusive marriage. Why does preserving it seem to matter more than protecting me?
00:00
And here's the last question: "I'm stuck in an abusive
marriage. My husband hits me. Christian friends say that
divorce is not allowed. Why does it feel like preserving my
marriage matters more than protecting me from the person who
is hurting me?"
00:23
Well, I need to say something clearly and immediately before
we discuss further. What is happening to you is not okay. It
is not okay. It is not your fault. And your safety matters to
God more than any rule your friends have quoted at you. I am
saddened and grieved that people meant to support you have
instead added to your suffering with an incomplete picture of
what Scripture actually teaches.
01:02
Let's deal directly with the claim your friends made, because
I think it misrepresents both Scripture and God's heart. The
passages most often cited on divorce — Matthew 19:3–9,
Mark 10:2–12 and 1 Corinthians 7 — address the sanctity of
the marriage covenant and God's ideal for permanence. I said
God's ideal for permanence.
01:38
But even within these passages, Jesus and Paul both
acknowledge exceptions: sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9), and
abandonment by an unbelieving spouse (1 Corinthians 7:15),
where Paul says the believer is not enslaved in such cases —
literally, "not bound." In other words, in these exceptions,
even though God hates divorce, these teachings allow for
divorce as an exception.
02:17
A growing mainstream of Christian theologians and pastors,
including many who hold a high, traditional view of covenantal
marriage, now recognise ongoing physical abuse as a form of
abandonment of the marriage covenant. A husband who violently
harms his wife has abandoned his vow to love her as Christ
loved the church and gave himself for her (Ephesians 5:25).
In the most basic and physical sense, there is abandonment.
03:01
Using Scripture to trap a woman in physical danger inverts the
very heart of the passages being cited. In other words, the
Scriptures have been used wrongly, to communicate exactly the
wrong message.
03:24
More broadly, nowhere does Scripture ask victims to endure
ongoing abuse as a mark of faithfulness. God's heart for the
oppressed is a consistent thread throughout the Bible. "The
Lord is near to the brokenhearted" (Psalm 34:18). The Lord
defends the fatherless and the oppressed (Psalm 10:17–18).
And Jesus' own ministry repeatedly prioritised the vulnerable
over religious, self-righteous rule-keeping. He was famously
criticised for this by the religious leaders of his day.
04:18
Sometimes separating for safety, even permanent separation,
is not a failure of faith. In many cases, remaining in danger
is not keeping a vow. It is, in fact, tolerating a sin against
you.
04:39
I also want to push back on your friends' theology, because
bad counsel in moments like this can cause you real harm.
Faithful biblical counsel must always prioritise your safety
first. It must engage church leadership or professional
counsellors — ideally someone trained in domestic abuse —
because general marriage counselling may end up insisting
that you stay in the marriage, which could put you in grave
danger. In this way, it may treat the abuser's behaviour as
something legitimate, and not your desire for safety.
05:27
Your desire for safety is natural and legitimate. And I
repeat: your desire for safety is not the violation of the
marriage covenant. The one who abused you has violated the
marriage covenant.
05:48
I once had a church member who was an alcoholic and beat up
his wife during his drunken state. The wife kept hiding her
injuries and lied about them. One day she confided the truth
to me, and I subsequently met up with the husband. He
admitted as much, and went for addiction counselling as
advised by me. Unfortunately, the violence did not stop. I
advised her to move out and be separated. Eventually they
divorced, and she was given custody of their two children.
Today she's happily remarried, with a blended family. She is
thankful that she was not counselled to remain married on the
flawed biblical interpretation that "God hates divorce" in
that situation.
07:07
What you can do. First, practically and urgently, please
connect with the National Anti-Violence and Sexual Harassment
Helpline. The number is
1800 777 0000.
And if at any time you are in immediate danger, when the
violence cannot be stopped, call the police at once at
999.
It is important that you are safe.
07:46
Second, for Christians hearing this: if someone confides
abuse to you, do not default to trying to save the marriage.
Believe that the assault — the beating of the wife — is real.
Prioritise their physical safety immediately, and involve
people specifically trained in domestic abuse. Battered women
have died from such prolonged, hidden abuse.
08:21
Protecting the vulnerable is not a lesser calling than
preserving a marriage. In cases like this, it is the more
faithful one. We are not called to preserve a bad marriage
where a spouse is at risk of being beaten to death.
08:46
And that's it for today. I hope this conversation has given
you something to think about, and helped you see some of
these difficult questions from different perspectives. Thanks
for listening, and God bless you.